Evaluation
Mental Health First Aid Research
There is a
program of research to evaluate the effects of the Mental Health First Aid
(MHFA) training course. So far, four studies have been completed:
1. Uncontrolled trial with the public in 2001
2. Controlled trial in the workplace
3. Controlled trial in a rural area
4. Qualitative study of first aiders experiences
5. Australian National Survey Looks at Mental Health First Aid Responses of Public
6. MHFA Training: review of evaluation studies Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2006
1. Uncontrolled trial with the public in
2001
The first evaluation study of MHFA was an uncontrolled trial
in 2001 with members of the public living in Canberra. This trial examined the
effects of the course on knowledge of mental disorders, stigmatizing attitudes
and help provided to others. There were 210 participants who were given
questionnaires at the beginning of the course, at the end, and at 6 months
follow-up. The course was found to produce the following benefits:
- Better recognition of mental disorders from case vignettes.
- Changed beliefs about treatment to be more like those of health professionals.
- Decreased social distance from people with mental disorders.
- Increased confidence in providing help.
- Increase in the amount of help provided to others.
Download full report of uncontrolled trial from BMC Psychiatry 2002,
2:10.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-244X-2-10.pdf
(Opens in new window).
There is also a report of this article in the
British Medical Journal 16 November 2002 :
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7373/1133 (Opens in new
window).
2. Controlled trial of MHFA in the workplace
in 2002
Because the first study had no control group, a second
trial was conducted in which course participants were compared with a wait-list
control group. This randomized controlled trial was carried out in 2002 with
employees of two Australian government departments who did the course during
their work time. This trial involved 301 participants who were randomized to
either participate immediately in a course or to be wait-listed for 5 months
before undertaking the training. The trained group improved more than the
wait-list control group in the following areas:
- Greater confidence in providing help to others.
- Greater likelihood of advising people to seek professional help.
- Improved concordance with health professionals about treatments.
- Decrease in stigmatizing attitudes.
- Improved mental health in the participants themselves.
The mental health benefits of the course to participants were unexpected
because the course does not provide therapy and promises no personal benefits.
We think the course may mental health benefits by providing participants with
good quality information which allows them to make better choices about their
own mental health care.
Download full report of workplace trial from BMC
Psychiatry 2004, 4:23. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-244X-4-23.pdf
(Opens in new window).
3.
Controlled trial of MHFA with the public in a rural area in 2003
A
trial has been carried out with members of the public in a large rural area of
New South Wales. This trial was carried out as a partnership between the New
South Wales Southern Area Health Service and the Centre for Mental Health
Research. In this trial, the catchment area of the Southern Area Health Service
was divided into 16 local government areas. Eight of these areas received the
course immediately and the other 8 were placed on a waiting list to receive the
training later in the year (the controls). There were 753 participants in the
trial: 416 of these were in the areas that received the course immediately and
337 were in the control group that was placed on a waiting list to do the course
later. People who did the course showed a number of changes relative to the
control group:
- Better recognition of disorders from case descriptions of a person with either depression or schizophrenia.
- Less negative attitudes towards people with mental disorders.
- More like health professionals in their beliefs about what treatments are likely to be helpful
- Greater confidence in providing help to someone.
- More likely to actually provide help to someone.
The course did not change the following:
- Number of people with mental disorders that the participant had contact with.
- Advising people to seek professional help.
As a follow-up to this trial, we are currently doing a qualitative study
asking participants about their experiences in providing help after doing the
course. We want to find out how many people actually used their skills following
the course and whether they had good or bad experiences in doing
so.
Download full report of the rural trial from BMC Psychiatry 2004,
4:33. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-244X-4-33.pdf(Opens
in new window).
4. Qualitative study of first aiders’ experiences.
People who have
completed the Mental Health First Aid course often tell stories about how they
have used their first aid skills to help someone. These stories are
particularly interesting because they tell about the effects of the first aid on
the person helped. In order to systematically analyze such stories, 131 former
course participants were approached 19-21 months following the course and asked
to complete a questionnaire about their experiences. 94 of these people
responded. It was found that 78% had used their first aid skills. Many positive
effects were reported, including increased empathy and confidence and being
better able to handle crises. There was no evidence that people were
over-reaching themselves because of over-confidence. Participants were very
positive about the benefits of the course and keen to see it repeated and
extended.
Download full report
of this study from BMC Psychiatry 2005, 5:43
http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-244X-5-43.pdf(Opens
in new window).
5. Australian National Survey Looks at Mental Health First Aid Responses of the Public.
A national survey of 4000
Australian adults has examined how they would respond to someone they know and
care about who has a mental disorder. Survey participants were given a
description of a person with either depression or schizophrenia and asked what
they would do to help the person. Many people said they would listen to the
person and encourage professional help-seeking. However, a significant minority
did not even mention these basic first aid strategies. Few said they would
contact a professional on the person's behalf or accompany them to a
professional. Mental health first aid responses were generally more appropriate
in women than men, and in participants with less stigmatizing attitudes.
Participants who could correctly recognize depression or schizophrenia in the
descriptions also had better first aid responses. These results show that mental
health first aid skills need improving in a number of areas. They also show that
lack of knowledge of mental disorders and stigmatizing attitudes are barriers to
people providing first aid.
Download full report of this
survey from BMC Psychiatry 2005, 5:9
http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-244X-5-9.pdf(Opens
in new window).
6. MHFA Training: review of evaluation studies.
Australia and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2006;40:6-8
